What is Deep Reasoning?
What is deep reasoning and is it the beginning of a path to a Terminator-like future?
With every new AI model release, we get the promise of, among other things, newer, better deep reasoning models that “think harder.”
Which then leads to the deeper questions. How close are we to gaining Artificial General Intelligence. Can AI “think” on its own, can it surpass human thought, and are the Terminators far behind?
What is Artificial General Intelligence?
To understand why most AI models aren’t AGI, we first need to understand what AGI means—and how it differs from sophisticated pattern recognition.
Artificial General Intelligence or AGI, or Superintelligence is the idea that eventually AI will be able to perform or outperform any human-powered cognitive task.
The AGI community on Reddit self-define AGI as “the intelligence of a machine that could successfully perform any intellectual task that a human being can. It is a primary goal of artificial intelligence research and an important topic for science fiction writers and futurists. Artificial general intelligence is also referred to as “strong AI”, “full AI” or as the ability of a machine to perform “general intelligent action”.
But today’s AI models, despite their marketing claims, operate fundamentally differently from this vision of AGI.
➤ Read More: Are you protecting your data? Or are you just hoping no one will steal your content?
What’s Your Sizzle?
Everyone has an unfair advantage. Does AI understand yours?
Enter your URL. Get your five-page Sizzle Scan analysis.
What Deep Reasoning Claims to Be
The early marketing (now largely debunked) around “deep reasoning” suggests we’re witnessing a breakthrough in AI consciousness—machines that can truly think, analyze, and make logical leaps like humans do.
The messaging implies we’ve crossed some threshold where AI moves beyond simple pattern matching into genuine intellectual processing.
The promise is compelling: an AI that can contemplates problems, weighs options, and arrives at insights through a process that mirrors human thought. It’s the difference between a very sophisticated autocomplete and a digital thinking partner.
As AI evolves, we will keep seeing more promises of deep reasoning. But what does that really mean? And is it as terrifying as it sounds?
– Monica Poling
What Deep Reasoning Really Is
Before we dive into what Deep Reasoning is, we need to understand what AI does.
AI’s Fundamental Question
AI essentially asks one question: “How likely is it that X will happen next?”
Simple example: How likely is it that it will be dark at midnight? 100 percent, right?
But context matters. What about Alaska? Suddenly the AI adjusts: 95 percent overall, 50 percent in Alaska, zero percent during Alaskan summer.
Despite wrapping its conversational models in a friendly, “I got your back, BFF” tone, this isn’t reasoning. it is still simple math. Pattern recognition. Every “reason” why it doesn’t get dark at midnight becomes a variable in a massive dataset. (And by massive I mean number-of-stars-in-the-sky massive.)
“Deep Reasoning” is Really Just Better Pattern Recognition
Human brains excel at seeing relationships (not just the “I love you” kind, but the “oh, I see we have this in common” kind.) Which is why we “relate” AI output to reasoning—because it mimics a reasonable companion.
AI doesn’t have “original thoughts,” but it can hold onto variables users define as “important” and based on its inherent pattern matching, it can also identify other variables that “might be important” to the user. It can also spot patterns humans might miss. (Do you read every word in that sample contract? Maybe, maybe not. AI does, and it might find a tiny variable it can use to craft a better response.)
The Math Behind Pattern Recognition
Let me quickly dive into the math behind all this variable engineering. Imagine you have a data set of five variables. That means there are 120 possible combinations or ways to organize those variable.
Say you’re a florist selling five types of flowers: roses, lilies, daisies, tulips, and chrysanthemums. That means you could sell a total of 120 flower combinations, ie just roses or just tulips, or tulips and roses, or tulips, roses and lilies. (In pure math, roses and tulips is a “different variable” than tulips and roses.)
Now let’s say you get a GREAT deal on carnations. Now the total number of flower combinations you could sell jumps to 720 (up from 120). Add one more flower, and you’re already up to 5,040 flower combinations. The numbers gets pretty large pretty quickly.
Now, do you advertise every single flower combo on your website? Of course not. You “predict” which flowers or flower combos will sell well and you feature those combos. Roses at Valentine’s Day, lilies at Easter. These are known “patterns.”
What AI can do is take your info (it “sees” on your website that daisies and carnations do well to together and notices a “pattern”). It can now apply that “pattern” to all other data sets in its very, very large memory bank.
What we call “reasoning” is really just a bigger capacity to identify new variables and new patterns and run them through language models to understand the larger context of these patterns. It’s impressive, but it’s not real reasoning.
Pet Rock: 2025
Here’s how this works in practice. You get an email announcing Pet Rock 2025. “That’s weird,” you think. “Didn’t pet rocks disappear in the ’80s?” You click, because you’re curious.
Traditional email marketing tracks pet rock clicks and subsequent behavior: did you buy, did you read for a long time, did you click to another page?
Modern AI takes these patterns to the next level. It sees the click and automatically categorizes your interest (without human engineering): this person likes rocks, this person likes pets, this person likes hard things. It might even create new variables based on other patterns in its datasets: This person may like oval things, this person may like grey things. It might even create a new variable combo: “pets and rocks.”
Real World Example: Pandora
A great example of “emerging AI” is Pandor’s Music Genome Project. Humans identified up to 450 unique characteristics for each piece of music. (That number varies depending on type of music: rock and pop songs have fewer “genes” than jazz songs, for example.) But the data still had to be hand-coded.
Before the Music Genome Project, you’d listen to music based on broad categories, like hard rock or classical. With these 450 little strands of music DNA (hence the genome name) music lovers could gain considerably more nuanced recommendations. Someone who loves Vivaldi’s Spring might also enjoy Manhattan Transfer’s Birdland because of rhythmic similarities.
This early algorithmic thinking varies from “modern AI” because it relies on a pre-set number of variables. No ability to identify and add new variables without human assistance.
If Zither rock became a new trend, a human would still have to enter Zither Rock and its DNA into the database.
How Does this Apply to AI Writing?
In the case of writing, the system is the same. Organize thoughts into variables. In writing, variables mean phrases.
Take the phrase (one of my most hated in all marketing writing): “Marketing advice that actually works.” AI could break this into five variables, one for each word and calculate all 120 combinations.
Or It could break it the sentence into into two phrases: “marketing advice” and “that actually works” Far less resource intensive. Then AI can take these phrases and cross-match them across all its datasets.
Would AI ever generate a title “Marketing advice” and “that smells like an elephant.” Of course not. Not because it can “reason” that marketing doesn’t smell like elephants. But because its rapid pattern matching tells it “no one is using this combo, so discard it.”
It’s also possible the pattern could go into a separate “watch” database, so it could watch for and track emerging conversational trends.
A contemporary example of this might look like this:
“pumpkin” + “spice” : Pattern found (2010), add to watch database
“pumpkin spice” : Mathematical increase, new pattern found, add to pattern database.
“pumpkin spice” + “latte”: Possible new, add to watch database
“pumpkin spice latte” : mathematic increase found, add to pattern database
Again, incredible technology, not human reasoning.
The Real Break Through: Memory Not Reasoning
Why AI, why now? In a word: memory. Up until very recently, our computers just didn’t have the computation power to track tiny variables and calculate large datasets.
Back when I was still using a PC386 (in the dark ages when floppy disks were still a thing), I tried to calculate a dataset from an 8×8 grid, or 64 variables . My PC conked out in a dramatic death gesture that rivaled any Hollywood diva.
Today’s computing power means AI can extrapolate millions (billions) of tiny variables. The tiniest piece of information can now become variables, because computation power no longer requires (quite as much) efficiency. It no longer requires picking the “right” variables.
Moreover, not only is AI storing millions of variables, it is matching them against numerous datasets. When we hear “training,” we think of AI searching a giant database of writing samples. That may well be how it works, but there are likely hundreds or thousands of datasets, neural networks, relation networks: writing databanks, statistical trends, and so much more.
So now those tiny variables are rapidly circulating through all those databank which means AI can predict what’s next fairly rapidly.
So memory, tiny variables, and speed are the story of modern AI.
Two Types of Memory
Before diving too far into memory capacity, let’s talk about ChatGPT, which has two types of memory: persistent memory and big context memory.
Persistent Memory works like a Personnel Manual or Standard Operating Procedure. It’s an always-there notebook or “personality” that guides how GPT sounds and how it responds universally across all of a user’s prompts. The size of persistent memory is minimal.
GPT’s Big Context Memory is where the under-the-hood magic happens. It can hold and interpret massive amounts of data, with one big caveat: only as long as you stay in that chat or window where the conversation is happening. Leave the room, leave behind the memory.
Token-ality
What’s a Token?
Think of a token as a chunk of text—sometimes a full word, sometimes just part of one. A good rule of thumb: one typed, double-spaced page is about 400 tokens.
Today’s top-tier AI models offer anywhere from 128K to 400K tokens depending on your plan and whether you’re using the interface or the API. A ~256K–400K token window is like having 600–1,000 pages of context open at the same time.
Why Memory Matters (And What It Means for You)
Understanding that AI excels at pattern recognition rather than true reasoning changes how we should approach these tools. It means AI can be an incredibly powerful assistant for tasks involving data analysis, consistency checking, and creative brainstorming—but we shouldn’t expect it to make intuitive leaps or creative breakthroughs that break established patterns.
This distinction becomes crucial as AI tools become more integrated into professional workflows. Knowing AI’s actual capabilities helps us leverage its strengths while avoiding over-reliance on its supposed “thinking” abilities.
In other words, just because AI recognizes “pumpkin spice latte” as a trending pattern, doesn’t mean it works in your context, no matter how much AI wants the pattern to work.
Real-World Applications of Enhanced Pattern Recognition
Okay, tokens, memory, tiny variable, patterns, open window, check! But what does that mean in real world applications?
The Romance Novel Test
If you’ve ever used AI to write a romance novel (ahem, inquiring minds want to know), the earlier models could set up a decent story. Not Pulitzer Prize worthy, but good enough to get any writer past their writer’s block.
But around Chapter 3, ChatGPT would start sounding like a kid high on candy. Lost memories, repeated dialogue, mixing up the hero and villain’s names.
Today’s AI can go well beyond three chapters. It can remember and cross reference more variables
A writer crafting a serialized story could (ostensibly) set up characters, scenes, and dialog snippets across multiple novels, and AI could now go well beyond Chapter 3, and even ensure consistency across an entire series.
I don’t recommend writing a romance novel in AI, but dropping in a few chapters and asking for issues with consistency can eliminate problems like “why did five years pass but my characters only aged one year?” (Fans of the Will Trent book series surely feel my pain.)
Research & Data Analysis
Even if you’re not a romance writer, additional tokens (no matter your level) gives you a lot of play to improve your outputs.
For example, you’ve uploaded several documents, including an organizational overview of the foundation you’re pitching, and you’ve also uploaded your own annual report and other supporting documents. You tell ChatGPT to find any unexpected commonalities that might give you an edge.
This is where “reasoning” goes to town. And this is why AI can and should be leveraged for good.
AI can now search for many more hidden patterns across a much larger data set. (And the application of Model Context Protocol takes this to brand new levels.)
Before it might have summarized your annual report, which would have limited its ability to “notice” the finer details. Now you can connect your tools and event extend the query to include external searches.
Of course, ChatGPT will spit out the obligatory compliance matrix. But wait! Theoretically, it could also “notice” both the foundation director and your organization’s CMO both mention pets in their bios. You could leverage that connection.
More tokens, more inputs, more outputs, more variables, more patterns. Reasoning-like, but not in fact actual reasoning.
➤ Read More: Why you really need AI? Stop optimizing for time savings. AI’s real superpower is turning the gold mine of disconnected business info into your competitive edge.
Why This Still Isn’t Human Reasoning
Here’s why AI’s “deep reasoning” isn’t actually deep (and probably never can be.)
Humans aren’t always reasonable. In fact, they almost never are.
Unreasonable Humans
If a kid asks mom for a cookie an hour before dinner, all datasets should predict: no cookie. But if mom just got a raise, or she connected with an old flame on Facebook, or spotted a sale on her favorite Manolo Blahniks, the kid gets a cookie.
Reason suggests a before and after outcome. Pattern “dinner” + “soon” = result: no cookie.
AI can try to extrapolate new variables loosely based on human emotions. Shoe sale equals increased likelihood of cookie approval. But one shoe sale doesn’t predict mom will be in an equally good mood for the next sale. She already has her fancy shoes, right?
AI will get better at self-defining new variables, and especially variables based on human emotions, but our human reactions to seemingly random things will always confound AI.
The Rules of Writing
Let’s talk about writing as a measure for predictability.
Much as some writers would argue differently, writing has a very distinct set of rules. These rules manifest themselves mostly through two main datasets. AP Styles and The Chicago Manual of Style.
As a former journalist, I was trained in AP Styles, and most of my writing still follows these guidelines. But not always. Whether I’m feeling rebellious, or I’m trying to make a point, or sometimes I just want to show AI it was wrong – so, there, AI, you don’t know everything!- I do occasionally hop off the AP Style rulebook.
I can barely define for myself when and why that happens, so how can AI ever “reason” when it is okay to skip the rule book and when it is not okay.
AI Loves Cliches
Here’s the crux of the matter — and one reason current large language models (LLMs) are unlikely to achieve truly human-like reasoning without major architectural changes.
AI has a thing for clichés. It leans on them the way some people lean on comfort food — familiar, easy, and always close at hand. Even when you give it explicit instructions to avoid overused phrases, it often slips them back in. That’s because those patterns are deeply embedded in its training data, and its job is, fundamentally, to predict the next most likely word or phrase.
So you might get a perfectly good, elegant sentence rewritten to include “that actually works,” “shouting into the void,” or the ever-popular “in a world where….” The model isn’t “choosing” these phrases because they’re the best creative fit — it’s retrieving what it has learned people say most often in similar contexts.
Human reasoning, in contrast, often goes against the obvious pattern.
Take our earlier “marketing advice that smells like an elephant” example. Maybe it’s clunky, but what if I intended to say it? What if I was making a point or playing with imagery? An LLM will almost always strip it out and replace it with the safer, statistically common “marketing advice that actually works.”
This isn’t malice; it’s math. When the model sees a rare phrase, the probabilities tell it to discard it in favor of something “normal.” And those probabilities are learned from billions of examples of human language, where “actually works” shows up far more often than “smells like an elephant.”
A quick example: when I used Claude AI to double-check the math in my flower variables section, it closed its answer with — word for word — “This is AI advice that actually makes sense.” The irony? In that very section, “actually” was on my personal list of words to avoid. But it’s so statistically favored in its training that it slid right back in, even when my instructions explicitly said not to.
That’s the bigger point: LLMs can sometimes learn when to break patterns, but even that decision is based on other patterns. They are, by design, feedback systems — circling inside their learned habits without an independent “Ctrl–Alt–Delete” to clear them out.
Are We Terminator Ready?
So, should we worry about AI taking over?
Short answer: not yet — and probably not in the way Hollywood imagines it. We aren’t at a “Skynet: Day 0” moment; we’re still at a “the servers got a serious memory upgrade” moment.
The Terminator films hinge on the idea of AI becoming self-aware and “deciding” to eliminate humans. That scenario assumes consciousness — something we are nowhere near achieving. Today’s AI models, for all their impressive memory gains, are still sophisticated autocomplete systems.
It feels revolutionary — and in its ability to hold more variables and context at once, it is — but it’s not building independent thought like “Mom loves shoes, kid gets cookie” or “Humans are unnecessary, eliminate them.”
And for now, there’s no known training data or system design that would spontaneously produce that last conclusion. So humanity is safe… at least until someone decides to train a model exclusively on action-movie scripts.
➤ Read More: Why you really need AI? Stop optimizing for time savings. AI’s real superpower is turning the gold mine of disconnected business info into your competitive edge.
Fundamentally, deep reasoning is a prediction engine, however sophisticated. It excels at “What usually comes next?” but struggles with “What if we tried something completely different?”
– Monica Poling
Creativity Lives in the Unpredictable Spaces
Even if AI achieved human-level intelligence tomorrow, it would still face one fundamental challenge:
Creativity emerges from the unpredictable spaces. Creativity is the person who says “marketing that smells like an elephant” and not the person who accepts “marketing advice that actually works” as the default answer.
We live in an era of too much information (much of it bad). It is the creative solutions that rises above. The key to winning the attention game is standing out. AI is inherently about blending in.
Standing out doesn’t just mean being different. It means being passionately, obsessively, joyously different. It is about emotion. Not reason.
It is the creative individual – the weird, wild idea makers – who do “standing out” the best. Not because they are looking to beat the algorithms. But because their joy and their passion and their deep interest make them worth following
AI can simulate these qualities, but simulation isn’t reality.
Humans Need Humans
Still, fundamentally, deep reasoning is a prediction engine, however sophisticated. It excels at “What usually comes next?” but struggles with “What if we tried something completely different?”
This is the ultimate confounding factor. Humans need humans.
It is unreasonable and it elicits unreasonable responses. And it is the ultimate departure from pattern. One that AI can never “understand” or emulate, no matter how many variables and datasets it has under its belt.
What’s Next
AI will continue to get better at understanding patterns. As it does so, it will continue to infringe on copyright and creativity. Not because AI is inherently evil. Rather, because AI’s creators believe individual creativity belongs to the masses.
Meanwhile AI’s own programming will assimilate human creativity, but then dampen it, as it elevates its learned patterns over human originality.
The future belongs to those who understand this distinction and use AI as a powerful tool to help elevate their uniquely human creative edge not replace it.
➤ Read More: What is MCP? Model Context Protocol or MCP is the ability of AI to interconnect apps. It could change the way we work. Forever.
The Bottom Line
Deep reasoning is real — but it’s really just better pattern recognition. What’s changed isn’t that AI thinks more like a human. It’s that AI can hold more information, spot more variables, and run more combinations faster than ever before. That’s genuinely useful. It’s also genuinely different from thought.
The businesses who win with AI are the ones who treat it like a thinking partner. They’re the ones who treat it like a very well-read, very fast assistant who will always default to the most statistically common answer — unless you tell it otherwise.
Key Takeaways
- Deep reasoning” is a marketing term. What it describes is faster, larger-scale pattern recognition — impressive, but not human thought.
- Memory is the real AI breakthrough. More tokens means more context, more variables, more useful outputs. That’s the story.
- AI defaults to the predictable. Clichés, common phrases, safe answers. Your job is to push past the default.
- Creativity lives where patterns break. The weird idea, the elephant metaphor, the rule you broke on purpose — AI can’t generate that. You can.
- Use AI for what it’s really good at. Consistency checks, pattern spotting, data analysis, grant research. Not
Work with Me
Ask the
Expert
Turn your organizational knowledge into your biggest business asset
Most businesses have incredible expertise — but that knowledge is buried in emails, documents, and people’s heads — their website barely scratches the surface. That gap quietly costs leads, sales, and trust. Ask the Expert turns your expertise into a 24/7 AI-powered search engine and knowledge base.
Data on Tap
AI-Generated Biz Tools
Imagine how AI can visualize your expertise (and collect leads)
Data on Tap is a growing collection of AI-powered intelligence visualization tools that turn your knowledge into an interactive playground — data visualizations, calculators, and more. Using AI, you can build most of these tools in an afternoon. Follow along as I show you how. (Or contact me to build one for you.)
AI Workshops for
Organizations & Teams
Practical AI for better decision making.
AI is reshaping every industry — but most of today’s training focuses on tools. My interactive sessions start with strategy – where is your business feeling friction and how can you use AI to organize, share and monetize your knowledge. Customizable for large and small groups.
Speaking &
Keynotes
Start with your Unfair Advantage
Most businesses can’t track where their revenue actually comes from — or where it’s quietly leaking out. These keynotes and sessions show audiences how to map their revenue, close the gap between strategy and execution, and use AI as a real thinking partner along the way. You leave with frameworks you can deploy Monday morning.